If you've been keeping up with Huawei's recent efforts to expand on the US market, you likely heard of the major deal collapse between the Chinese OEM and AT&T. In the short term, this is undoubtedly disappointing for anybody anticipating to see the new Mate 10 Pro and future Huawei devices on carrier contract deals.
However, the issue and its potential implications go way beyond that.
On Thursday, when we officially heard about the cancelled deal, a few
US legal concerns were cited as an explanation. As it turns out, there
was an entire bill, titled H. R. 4747: "Defending U.S. Government
Communications Act", which originated on January 9, seeking to ban all
US agencies and branches of the government from using carriers and
service providers that use hardware or any platforms courtesy of Huawei
and ZTE. To be even more specific, the bill, which has already been
proposed in the US Congress is looking to blacklist entities that use
any of the following:
- Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
- Telecommunications services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
- Telecommunications equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the head of the relevant agency reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.
The bill was sponsored by Texas-based Republican House member Michael
Conaway - a person probably familiar to many for heading the ongoing
investigation into Russia's alleged interference in the US election.
But why is this important? It's not like Huawei or ZTE's smartphone
sales comprise mostly of work phones for US officials. Be that as it
may, both companies are huge players in the enterprise
telecommunications sector. It is more than likely that all major
carriers in the US rely, at least to some extent, on hardware and
services provided by the pair. This means that such a major unfavourable
attitude towards them on a government level will definitely have a
negative effect of all other dealings. Case and point, the AT&T
negotiations, cancelled in their final stages.
Still, even if we are sad to see the Huawei Mate 10 Pro narrowly miss
the next AT&T deals brochure, it is hard to confidently take sides
on the matter. The newly proposed bill is not a fluke and builds on past
precedents, like a 2013 ban on ZTE selling products to the US
government, a further proposal to rest the Pentagon form buying
equipment from Chinese or Russian telecommunications companies, as well
as a US China Commission that fount Huawei, ZTE and others are:
"directly subject to direction by the Chinese Communist Party…" and
"shared with the Chinese state intimate and extensive knowledge of
foreign telecommunications systems it is involved with.".
All things considered, it seems pretty clear that for the time being,
US carriers are likely to shy away from the two Chinese tech giants and
any smartphone distribution deals. As for the bigger picture, it's way
too early to say. To even make it to a vote, the newly proposed bill
will have to be approved by the Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform. Only after that can it be passed by both houses of Congress and,
if approved, on the President for a final sign-off.
Last, but not least, to sprinkle in even more drama in the mix, the
US Commerce Department is currently investigating Huawei's dealings in
Syria, Cuba, Iran and Sudan. While ZTE was already fined over $1 billion
last year after violating U.S.-Iran sanctions by shipping product from
the U.S. to Iran and then lying about it in front of federal
investigators.
No comments:
Post a Comment